Bletchley sends lawful requests under the UK GDPR on behalf of the people it represents — asking organisations to stop processing, or to erase, that person's personal data. This page exists so you can confirm the request is genuine before you act on it.
All four are true of every request we send. If any one is missing, treat the message as suspicious.
bletchley.app. Check the authentication results in your mail headers — we publish SPF, DKIM and DMARC on that domain precisely so you can verify it mechanically rather than taking our word for it.This list matters more than the one above. It is how you recognise something pretending to be us.
Reply to the address the request came from. That address is monitored and correspondence is logged with timestamps, which is as much for your protection as ours.
If you believe the request is misdirected — a different person with the same name, for instance — tell us. We would much rather correct a mistake than have you action the wrong record.
Search surfaces are swept for republished personal details. Most of what matters never reaches page one, so rank alone is not the test.
An Article 21 objection stating grounds relating to the individual's particular situation, with erasure under Article 17 in the alternative.
The page is fetched again afterwards. A controller saying "processed" is a claim; a page that no longer carries the details is a result.
Sources re-ingest on a cycle. Removed records are re-checked for months, because a removal that silently reverses is not a removal.
Bletchley works on behalf of individuals who want their personal information — home address, date of birth, direct contact details — to stop appearing on third-party websites they never gave it to.
We find where that information has been republished, ask the organisations concerned to stop, and check afterwards that it actually happened. We do not collect, buy, sell or hold data about anyone other than the people who ask us to act for them.
Where information is on a public register by law — a company director's entry at Companies House, for example — we say so plainly and do not ask anyone to remove it. Those requests would be improper and we do not send them.
Bletchley is taking on a small number of people at this stage. It suits company directors and others whose details reach the public record through an official register and are then copied widely.
Opens a short form. It is deliberately awkward for automated systems to reach, which is why it sits behind this step.